On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:13:10AM -0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > ----- Original Message ----- > > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 01:18:44PM +0200, marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > virtio-gpu is a non-legacy device, so device_id is always 0x10 + 0x1040. > > > > By non-legacy, you mean it is always a virtio-1.0 device ? > > Yes > > > > > We've previously discussed that we probably need to add virtio-1.0 > > variants for all the existing virtio devices to libosinfo, so that > > we can track which guest OS actually have support for the virtio-1.0 > > devices. They would need to have separate names, eg virtio1-blk instead > > of virtio-blk, to go along with the separate pci device IDs. So I'm > > thinking we will want to call this virtio1-gpu not virtio-gpu, so that > > we're consistent with naming > > Could this be done once the 1 variants are added? I've just sent a patch which adds data for all remaining virtio devices both legacy and modern :-) Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
