Hey, Ah, I thought this would treat testing as a pre-release for debian-stable.next (dunno what its name will be), but this actually treats debian-testing as some kind of rolling release. On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:56:30PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > data/os/debian.org/debian-testing.xml.in | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > po/POTFILES.in | 1 + > .../debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso.txt | 29 +++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 data/os/debian.org/debian-testing.xml.in > create mode 100644 test/isodata/debian/debiantesting/debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso.txt > > diff --git a/data/os/debian.org/debian-testing.xml.in b/data/os/debian.org/debian-testing.xml.in > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..a8879f3 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/data/os/debian.org/debian-testing.xml.in > @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ > +<libosinfo version="0.0.1"> > + <os id="http://debian.org/debian/8";> Hmm, should we assign it this version number? Once Debian 8 is released, /debian/8 will be something else. What about debian/testing? Also ,if we go with version numbers, we should have upgrades/derives-from. > + <short-id>debiantesting</short-id> > + <_name>Debian testing</_name> I'd go with Debian Testing, but if "Debian testing" is the spelling Debian uses, ignore my comment. Reviewed-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
