On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Althouth the values are correct, is impossible to have a nonmal > > "is" -> "it is". Okay. > >> (graphical) usage of a system with the recommended requirements >> (specially storage). > > "specially" -> "especially", I think. Okay. > > Why not bump the recommended resources instead? Hmm. You're right, actually makes more sense to increase the storage size than removing the recommended resources. I've already submitted a new patch. I'm not sure, but are all the other patches already ACKed? I'll re-submit the whole series again anyways, just want to be sure about them before doing this.. > >> --- >> data/os/opensuse.org/opensuse-tumbleweed.xml.in | 5 ----- >> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/data/os/opensuse.org/opensuse-tumbleweed.xml.in b/data/os/opensuse.org/opensuse-tumbleweed.xml.in >> index 994f39e..e98c353 100644 >> --- a/data/os/opensuse.org/opensuse-tumbleweed.xml.in >> +++ b/data/os/opensuse.org/opensuse-tumbleweed.xml.in >> @@ -44,11 +44,6 @@ >> <ram>1073741824</ram> >> <storage>3221225472</storage> >> </minimum> >> - <recommended> >> - <cpu>2400000000</cpu> >> - <ram>2147483648</ram> >> - <storage>5368709120</storage> >> - </recommended> >> </resources> >> </os> >> </libosinfo> >> -- >> 2.7.3 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Libosinfo mailing list >> Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo > > > > -- > Regards, > > Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
