On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:33:11PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> As now we depend on GLib 2.36, let's remove all checks/code that depend > >> on an older version than the one we require. > > > > Might be a good opportunity to also add some handling of > > GLIB_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED ? > > Indeed. What should be the max allowed version? Would you mind to have > it in a separate patch? Separate patch is fine, max version would be 2.36 at this point I guess. NB: GLIB_VERSION_MAX_ALLOWED can be a bit tricky to deal with in combination with -compat implementations of newer glib API, but so far libosinfo does not have these, so it should be fine for now. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
