On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:43:49AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> + <!-- Network Installer --> > >> + <media arch="i686"> > >> + <url>http://vault.centos.org/6.6/isos/i386/CentOS-6.6-i386-netinstall.iso</url> > >> + <iso> > >> + <system-id>LINUX</system-id> > >> + <volume-id>CentOS</volume-id> > > > > Did you ask CentOS people if it's possible to get a more specific volume > > id in the future (similar to the one for the non netinst ISOs) > > I didn't, at all. But I open a bug about this (even with the situation > being improved a lot for 6.7). Ah, opening a bug counts "asking CentOS people" :) > > > Maybe the netinst ISOs should be tagged with <variant>? (see how it's > > done for fedora for example). > > I don't see why. The variant is used to differentiate between > workstation/server, for instance. In our case we just have one kind of > media. Fedora has: <variant id="workstation"> <_name>Fedora 23 Workstation</_name> </variant> <variant id="workstation-netinst"> <_name>Fedora 23 Workstation</_name> </variant> hence the question. This distinction is then used when generating the kicstarter file. I'm fine with not having a variant for now. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo