Hey, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The regex matching x86-64 enterprise variants is not as strict as it > could: it's going to match IR5_CENNA_X64FREV or IR1_CENA_X64FREV for > example for which we don't have test cases. > However, I'm confident this will match > en_windows_8.1_enterprise_n_with_update_x64_dvd.iso and > en_windows_8.1_enterprise_x64_dvd.iso > if such ISOs exist, and that it's not going to give us false > positives. Since it might allow us to identify unknown ISOs > without false positives, I went for it. If you are confident about this, so am I. :) Honestly, looking at these Windows volume-ids give me headache, but kudos to MS for ensuring unique volume-ids though. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
