On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 07:12:56PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:29:49PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> >> Not exactly. It also never worked for live ISO and that is not a major >> >> issue since UIs aren't supposed to offer automatic installer against >> >> live medias. >> > >> > Is this documented somewhere? >> >> This question made me go catch an Anaconda dev: > > I was asking if this is documented somewhere in libosinfo API > documentation. Also note that your statement is « UIs aren't supposed to > offer automatic installer against live medias. », not « UIs aren't > supposed to offer automatic installer against Fedora live medias ». Oh, I thought the latter sentence would be self-evident to you so I thought you must be asking about the former. We have a 'installer' flag on media and media that do not provider installers are supposed to have it 'false'. AFAIK the idea of that flag was to inform applications that this media does not do installation. However, now that you mentioned it, I see that we don't set those on any of the live Fedora media. I think we should. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
