On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:37:14PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > However, apps will need a way to know whether a fedora ISO they have is >> > going to support unattended install or not. >> >> Yeah, although it's not a new problem. e.g express install has never >> worked for netiso and Apps have no way of telling that. > > Before, automatic install was working for the most ISOs, and something > people were more unlikely to download (netiso) was not working. > Now most ISOs will not be working, and we expect people to get the > netiso for automatic install to work, so imo the context has changed, > and this has become more important. Not exactly. It also never worked for live ISO and that is not a major issue since UIs aren't supposed to offer automatic installer against live medias. Also for F21, it didn't work against any ISO AFAIK. With these patches, it will work against the netiso at least. In case of F22, there will be workstation netisos provided and advertised so if user downloads them, they'll be given the opportunity to do automatic installation against them but if they choose live, they won't get such an option. The issue remains for server (and cloud) installers though. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
