Re: [PATCH 01/10] install-script: Add some missing docs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 04:37:14PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > However, apps will need a way to know whether a fedora ISO they have is
>> > going to support unattended install or not.
>>
>> Yeah, although it's not a new problem. e.g express install has never
>> worked for netiso and Apps have no way of telling that.
>
> Before, automatic install was working for the most ISOs, and something
> people were more unlikely to download (netiso) was not working.
> Now most ISOs will not be working, and we expect people to get the
> netiso for automatic install to work, so imo the context has changed,
> and this has become more important.

Not exactly. It also never worked for live ISO and that is not a major
issue since UIs aren't supposed to offer automatic installer against
live medias. Also for F21, it didn't work against any ISO AFAIK. With
these patches, it will work against the netiso at least. In case of
F22, there will be workstation netisos provided and advertised so if
user downloads them, they'll be given the opportunity to do automatic
installation against them but if they choose live, they won't get such
an option.

The issue remains for server (and cloud) installers though.

-- 
Regards,

Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
________________________________________
Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux