On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > > This is preexisting, but having an async function call into a sync > > function while an async variant exists is unexpected. > > Indeed. Do you think its worth it to change already or its ok to > correct that later. I don't really mind when this is done. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpW9DItiDKcw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
