On 09/23/2014 03:39 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 01:50:51PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >> This just adds a plain Fedora21 entry. F21 is going to have different >> versions like 'Workstation' and 'Server' but we don't seem to distinguish >> for other distros so I just stuck with the pattern here. > > I think this is done for some Windows ISOs, but that's about it. > >> >> This currently doesn't work for detecting Workstation media, since their >> volume IDs are truncated. Bug tracking that: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145264 >> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> data/oses/fedora.xml.in | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> .../Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-21_Alpha_TC7.iso.txt | 29 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 test/isodata/fedora/fedora21/Fedora-Server-DVD-x86_64-21_Alpha_TC7.iso.txt >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> index 27cdd4a..1848a78 100644 >> --- a/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> +++ b/data/oses/fedora.xml.in >> @@ -1584,4 +1584,90 @@ >> </minimum> >> </resources> >> </os> >> + >> + <os id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/21";> >> + <short-id>fedora21</short-id> >> + <_name>Fedora 21</_name> >> + <version>21</version> >> + <_vendor>Fedora Project</_vendor> >> + <family>linux</family> >> + <distro>fedora</distro> >> + <upgrades id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/20"/> >> + <derives-from id="http://fedoraproject.org/fedora/20"/> > > I would add a <release-status>prerelease</release-status> tag for now, > looks good otherwise > I also realize I forgot to update fedora-unknown, so I'll send a V2 Thanks, Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
