Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > --- > data/oses/freebsd.xml.in | 4 +-- > .../freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-amd64.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > .../freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-i386.txt | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > test/test-isodetect.c | 7 +++++ > 4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 test/isodata/freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-amd64.txt > create mode 100644 test/isodata/freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-i386.txt > > diff --git a/data/oses/freebsd.xml.in b/data/oses/freebsd.xml.in > index d1d6486..c8be1bf 100644 > --- a/data/oses/freebsd.xml.in > +++ b/data/oses/freebsd.xml.in > @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ > <eol-date>2016-12-31</eol-date> > > <media arch='i686'> > - <url>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.3/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso</url> > + <url>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/ISO-IMAGES/9.3/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso</url> > <iso> > <publisher-id>THE FREEBSD PROJECT. HTTP://WWW.FREEBSD.ORG/</publisher-id> > <system-id>FreeBSD</system-id> > @@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ > </media> > > <media arch='x86_64'> > - <url>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/ISO-IMAGES/9.3/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso</url> > + <url>ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/9.3/FreeBSD-9.3-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso</url> > <iso> > <publisher-id>THE FREEBSD PROJECT. HTTP://WWW.FREEBSD.ORG/</publisher-id> > <system-id>FreeBSD</system-id> > diff --git a/test/isodata/freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-amd64.txt b/test/isodata/freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-amd64.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..c01e5fc > --- /dev/null > +++ b/test/isodata/freebsd/freebsd9.3/freebsd-9.3-amd64.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ > +CD-ROM is in ISO 9660 format > +System id: FreeBSD > +Volume id: FREEBSD_INSTALL now that I look at your tests, I see that the "Volume id" is not clearly defining the version. Wouldn't this test detect as FreeBSD9.3 also older FreeBSD versions that have the same Volume id? I've found this bug reported by Daniel: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165876 Should we perhaps drop the ISO part? Thanks, Giuseppe _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
