"Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > Same comment about short log as for windows patch. > >> data/install-scripts/fedora.xml | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/data/install-scripts/fedora.xml b/data/install-scripts/fedora.xml >> index 0a5de10..4507e77 100644 >> --- a/data/install-scripts/fedora.xml >> +++ b/data/install-scripts/fedora.xml >> @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ >> <param name="target-disk" policy="optional"/> >> <param name="script-disk" policy="required"/> >> </config> >> + <supported-injection-method>cdrom</supported-injection-method> >> + <supported-injection-method>floppy</supported-injection-method> >> + <supported-injection-method>initrd</supported-injection-method> >> + <supported-injection-method>web</supported-injection-method> > > You never answered my question about how this affects commandline > generation. The one we have right now assumes the script to be a disk, > rather than initrd or web so at least currently I'd say these two > methods are not supported and therefore should not be listed here. ops, sorry, now I understand what you mean with "commandline generation". I've missed this part, and as I commented for Debian and Ubuntu patches, they need a command line to work. Giuseppe _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
