On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:48:44PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> --- >> data/oses/rhel.xml.in | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> index c7819d3..7b4223f 100644 >> --- a/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> +++ b/data/oses/rhel.xml.in >> @@ -964,4 +964,60 @@ >> <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/desktop'/> >> </installer> >> </os> >> + >> + <os id="http://redhat.com/rhel/7.0";> >> + <short-id>rhel7.0</short-id> >> + <_name>Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0</_name> >> + <version>7.0</version> >> + <_vendor>Red Hat, Inc</_vendor> >> + <family>linux</family> >> + <distro>rhel</distro> >> + <upgrades id="http://redhat.com/rhel/6.5"/> > > I suspect this will actually upgrade whatever RHEL6 release is current at > RHEL7 release time, Thats not exactly a problem IMO. When we add RHEL6.6, this could be changed at that time. I can leave a comment there actually so its more unlikely for someone adding RHEL6.6 to forget updating this node. > so dunno if it makes sense to have that here. I think it does. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
