Re: [PATCH 2/5] Add an optional 'is-continuous-snapshot' tag to OS entries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:52:54PM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> Applications can use this to determine if an OS is just a snapshot and
> not an actual released product yet. For example, gnome-continuous images
> for development snapshots of GNOME and nightly build ISOs of Fedora etc.

Hmm, hang on, this is getting confusing now.

My understanding was that the GNOME continuous images were officially
released products, not development pre-release snapshots. If they're
just pre-release snapshots, then the whole rationale for the split
I suggested goes away.


Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux