Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/2] ubuntu: Add jeos install-script (version >= 6.06)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:27:06PM +0100, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote:
>> From: Fabiano Fidêncio <fabiano@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> script base on: https://github.com/clalancette/oz/tree/master/oz/auto
>
> Oz is licensed under the LGPLv2-only, while libosinfo is LGPLv2-or-later
> so we need to be slightly careful in copying here.
>
> I'm unclear how much is your work, vs copied from Oz, but
> for safety sake I think we should be explicit about the license
> change here. GIT says the Ubuntu files there have changes from
> 4 people in Oz history.

The preseed files look very similar, and since that is most of the
patch, better to be safe.

>
>   Author: Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx>
>   Author: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@xxxxxxxxx>
>   Author: helgi <helgith@xxxxxxxxx>
>   Author: Joseph W. Breu <breu@xxxxxxxx>
>   Author: Steven Dake <sdake@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For any of the changes authored under Red Hat copyright, we have
> unconditional permission to change to LGPLv2+. The 2 changes by
> Helgi and Joseph Breu are so trivial to be not considered
> copyrightable material.
>
> We should still get an explicit ack from Chris for changes he's
> made since he left Red Hat though.
>
> Chris, can you reply to confirm you're ok with this.

In any case, yes, it is fine to license these bits under LGPLv2 or later.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux