On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 07:00:58PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 01:17:56AM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > It's silly, but I think it's worth using the tag name 'pre-release' > > over 'is-snapshot', as I wouldn't be surprised if some day libosinfo > > would have to differentiate between disk/image snapshot and > > "official/clean" pre-release. (one could have various > > personal/modified "snapshots of a particular pre-release", not the > > other way around) > > GNOME continuous is not really a pre-release of anything. I don't really > see disk snapshots showing up in libosinfo. What about <unreleased/> ? Are you saying that 'GNOME continuous' doesn't actually ever have formal releases ? If so, then I agree that we should have a way to distinguish between OS which follow the "continuous deployment" model vs those which are pre-releases. So how about names <is-pre-release/> <is-continuous-snapshot/> Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
