On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > NACK, Daniel's comments still stand, and > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2013-October/msg00015.html is not > useful at all to convince people that we should go with this for now, or > to help out. This patch follows the convention currently followed by libosinfo. Besides its a mater of minor (mostly internal) ugliness so I don't think its worth blocking my changes at all. My changes has been pending for a month now and now you also want Giuseppe's changes to be pending on this change as well. If you think otherwise and are not convinced with my arguments, feel free to fix this yourself. Otherwise, I don't thing you are being very fair here. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
