On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 07:03:36PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) > <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > gnome-continuous is continuous integration system so images produced by > > it track the git master of all modules and now that GNOME 3.10 is out and > > many projects have branched for 3.10 maintainance, these images are > > already 3.12 (3.11 at the moment but thats splitting hair I guess). > > --- > > So how about this patch? I have the same concerns about this that I do for the patch you proposed for Fedora rawhide. Namely that OS in libosinfo have some implied long term stability, but these are by definition moving targets. I understand your desire to include them though. Perhaps we should address this by adding a tag to the XML element indicating whether an OS is a formal release, or a snapshot ? That way apps can at least distinguish the two if they have a need to so, and we can declare that any OS database entry marked as a "snapshot" is liable to change arbitrarily over time. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
