On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:35:30PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > > This is to ensure that we do recognise medias of future releases of > Fedora and therefore give apps some clue about what they are dealing > with and some rough estimate of required resources. > --- > > I'd like to add similar entries for other OSs too but first I wanted to get > some feedback on this approach. I think this will help us/users running > pre-release ISOs. I'm not sure i like this idea. As it stands each OS instance uniquely refers to a specific OS release and once matched will never change. This "wildcard" entry however will have constantly changing match semantics which I don't find too appealing really. If an application records this OS ID in some persistent data storage, this will become invalid over time which I don't think is good. Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
