On 27.08.2013 11:18, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> All these symbols are present in the public headers but not listed
> in libosinfo.syms.
> They were found using abi-compliance-checker by
> comparing one build where the use of the .syms file is disabled (all
> non-static functions get exported), and one regular build.
> ---
> osinfo/libosinfo.syms | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
> index 7c191de..ccd7c30 100644
> --- a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
> +++ b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms
> @@ -420,6 +420,23 @@ LIBOSINFO_0.2.7 {
> } LIBOSINFO_0.2.6;
>
> LIBOSINFO_0.2.8 {
> + osinfo_avatar_format_new;
> +
> + osinfo_install_config_get_hardware_arch;
> + osinfo_install_config_get_hostname;
> + osinfo_install_config_get_reg_login;
> + osinfo_install_config_get_reg_password;
> + osinfo_install_config_get_reg_product_key;
> +
> + osinfo_install_config_param_get_value_map;
> + osinfo_install_config_param_set_value_map;
> +
> + osinfo_install_script_get_output_prefix;
> +
> + osinfo_loader_process_local_path;
> + osinfo_loader_process_system_path;
> + osinfo_loader_process_user_path;
> +
> osinfo_product_get_codename;
> osinfo_product_get_eol_date;
> osinfo_product_get_eol_date_string;
>
ACK series.
Michal
_______________________________________________
Libosinfo mailing list
Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
