They were listed in public header files, but not exported in libosinfo.syms. --- When applying Giuseppe's patch, I've noticed more missing symbols from OsinfoProduct, so I've pushed this patch as a followup under the trivial rule. I'm currently experimenting with abi-compliance-checker to see if it can be used to check that all symbols listed in a public header file are exported, maybe there are better tools for that? Christophe osinfo/libosinfo.syms | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms index c56ff1f..7c191de 100644 --- a/osinfo/libosinfo.syms +++ b/osinfo/libosinfo.syms @@ -421,6 +421,10 @@ LIBOSINFO_0.2.7 { LIBOSINFO_0.2.8 { osinfo_product_get_codename; + osinfo_product_get_eol_date; + osinfo_product_get_eol_date_string; + osinfo_product_get_release_date; + osinfo_product_get_release_date_string; } LIBOSINFO_0.2.7; /* Symbols in next release... -- 1.8.3.1 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo