On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:54:34PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:42:00PM +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > diff --git a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >> >> > index 735ced0..80296b6 100644 >> >> > --- a/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >> >> > +++ b/data/schemas/libosinfo.rng >> >> > @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ >> >> > <value>filesystem</value> >> >> > <value>input</value> >> >> > <value>memory.balloon</value> >> >> > + <value>misc.rng</value> >> >> > + <value>misc.fs</value> >> >> >> >> I'm guessing these values are based on something? Don't particularly >> >> like the 'misc' prefix. >> > >> > These are just made up names as the rng device does not have a PCI class >> > assigned. The existing memory.balloon is also something made up. >> > misc.fs should actually be removed from there as it's not used. >> > This only leaves misc.rng, I can change it to something else if you have >> > suggestions you like better. >> >> virtio? > > This is too limiting, we could have other paravirtual RNGs not using > virtio (for example vmware or virtualbox could provide one). paravirt then? :) -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
