On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:30:19PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 03:09:26PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > > --- > > > data/oses/centos.xml.in | 22 > > ++++++++++++++++ > > > .../centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso.txt | 29 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > .../centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso.txt | 29 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > test/test-isodetect.c | 6 +++++ > > > 4 files changed, 86 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > test/isodata/centos/centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso.txt > > > create mode 100644 > > test/isodata/centos/centos6.0/CentOS-6.0-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso.txt > > > > > > diff --git a/data/oses/centos.xml.in b/data/oses/centos.xml.in > > > index 3f09dea..bb8e570 100644 > > > --- a/data/oses/centos.xml.in > > > +++ b/data/oses/centos.xml.in > > > @@ -16,13 +16,35 @@ > > > <system-id>LINUX</system-id> > > > <volume-id>CentOS_6.0_Final</volume-id> > > > </iso> > > > + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> > > > + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> > > > </media> > > > <media arch="x86_64"> > > > <iso> > > > <system-id>LINUX</system-id> > > > <volume-id>CentOS_6.0_Final</volume-id> > > > </iso> > > > + <kernel>isolinux/vmlinuz</kernel> > > > + <initrd>isolinux/initrd.img</initrd> > > > </media> > > > + > > > + <resources arch="all"> > > > + <minimum> > > > + <n-cpus>1</n-cpus> > > > + <ram>536870912</ram> > > > + </minimum> > > > + > > > + <recommended> > > > + <cpu>400000000</cpu> > > > + <ram>1073741824</ram> > > > + <storage>9663676416</storage> > > > + </recommended> > > > + </resources> > > > + > > > + <installer> > > > + <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/jeos'/> > > > + <script id='http://redhat.com/scripts/rhel/desktop'/> > > > + </installer> > > > > This gets back to a question I had while I was writing the openSUSE > > patches, should we be duplicating this info, or should this be inherited > > through the clones/derives-from elements if it's not set? > > > > IMHO, this info should be inherited through the clones/derives-from > elements. > Should I change it? :-) If you feel like writing a patch for that, sure. Otherwise I guess we can take this patch as is for now. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpQyVF_NOI2u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
