On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 11:04:06PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > These values were parsed but ignored using ignore_value(), leading > > to very incomplete data when the data from pci.ids/usb.ids is used. > > As generally this data is complemented by <device> nodes in > > libosinfo database, and as this data takes precedence over > > the pci.ids/usb.ids data, this is not visible without removing > > the additional <device> data. > > Are you using 'this data' to refer to different data in the same > sentence or am I getting confused for no reason? Yup, my bad, I'll have to remove some uses of data ;) These values were parsed but ignored using ignore_value(), leading to very incomplete device information when using pci.ids/usb.ids. As generally this data comes from <device> nodes in libosinfo database, which takes precedence over the pci.ids/usb.ids data, this is not visible without removing the additional <device> data from the osinfo database. Is the log better phrased this way or does this need more improvement? Christophe
Attachment:
pgpLb7F_oGYUJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
