On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:55:36PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > Besides, if we are OK with adding APIs during API freeze and actual > drivers (the feature) during feature freeze, I don't really see see > the need to push any of my driver related work into this release. I don't mind that we add new API to libosinfo during GNOME's API freeze as this is an external dependency. I mind that we add post-install driver installation to Boxes during GNOME's feature freeze as this counts as a feature imo. That's why it sounds better to me that we get most of it working before GNOME's big freeze. Then we can refine things, potentially adding new libosinfo API if this proves needed, after the freeze as this would be bugfixing existing code, not adding new features. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpwMzkXytUsi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
