On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:05:28PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> The problem is that having it configurable would mean that we can't >> have a static info on the script about the signature requirement (see >> "installer: API to query signed device driver requirement" patch). > > Why is it not possible? The query API would return > REQ_STRICT/REQ_WARN/REQ_NONE as it currently does. > If you get REQ_STRICT/REQ_WARN, Actually I got mixed up in these discussions so I wrongly remembered that we agreed on that API for drivers, not the scripts. Sorry for that. > then the user can try to call > osinfo_install_script_disable_driver_signature_checks() (with a > better naming, this name is just for the purpose of this discussion) if > they wants to install drivers fully unattended. This setter can fail > in case libosinfo does not know how to do it. Yeah, now that I remember correctly this shouldn't be a problem. I'll make it configurable then if I must. I still don't think there is any need for it (at least yet). -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
