On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 04:49:05PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Christophe Fergeau > <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:54:52PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:05:53PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> >> whats the difference between copyleft and free, as in Free Software? > >> >> Reading this, I don't see any: > >> >> > >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft > >> > > >> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft#Types_of_copyleft_and_relation_to_other_licenses > >> > >> OK, I stand corrected about the exact definition of copyleft. :) > >> > >> Since you are stressing on this distinction, I imagine you know some > >> free drivers out there that are signed? > > > > Nope, but that does not mean they do not exist. > > Well then I'm just not being very precise in my commit log. With the > API I'm proposing, Apps can easily decide to not use unsigned drivers > even if script supports it. So I don't see the need for Apps to have > to use a configuration parameter to disable this manually. https://www.redhat.com/archives/libosinfo/2013-January/msg00108.html Christophe
Attachment:
pgpow3MdsrA76.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
