On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:05:28PM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> I don't really see this a real security feature of windows but more a >> control feature of Microsoft as they have made it impossible for free >> drivers to be signed. > > [snip] > >> If it was possible to have free (as in Free Software) drivers that >> were signed, we wouldn't have issues with virtio and qxl either. > > It is possible to have signed free drivers, it's copyleft licences that > they are rejecting. whats the difference between copyleft and free, as in Free Software? Reading this, I don't see any: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyleft -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
