On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 05:18:43AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > diff --git a/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.h b/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.h > index d91751e..82486ef 100644 > --- a/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.h > +++ b/osinfo/osinfo_install_script.h > @@ -163,6 +165,9 @@ OsinfoPathFormat osinfo_install_script_get_path_format(OsinfoInstallScript *scri > gboolean osinfo_install_script_get_can_pre_install_drivers(OsinfoInstallScript *script); > gboolean osinfo_install_script_get_can_post_install_drivers(OsinfoInstallScript *script); > > +OsinfoDeviceDriverFormat osinfo_install_script_get_pre_install_driver_format(OsinfoInstallScript *script); > +OsinfoDeviceDriverFormat osinfo_install_script_get_post_install_driver_format(OsinfoInstallScript *script); I don't think assuming that a given installer will support only one driver format is expressive enough. For Windows post-install drivers, supporting unpacked Windows drivers in addition to running a .exe shouldn't be very hard, and this API would not work there. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpjVIYfJdBi4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
