On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 11:24:42AM -0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 06:20:56AM +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: > >> From: "Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)" <zeeshanak@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Its just a C&P from F18 and seems to work nicely in practice. > > > > NACK, RHEL6 is based off Fedora 12/13 ( > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux#Relationship_to_free_and_community_distributions > > ) so it makes more sense to use Fedora 13 as a reference there (at least > > for the minimum requirements). > > http://www.redhat.com/resourcelibrary/articles/articles-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-technology-capabilities-and-limits > > has some figures for the minimal RAM requirements. > > Following your logic, Christophe, we should differentiate the minimal > requirements between architectures too, right? libosinfo already lets you differentiate requirements between arch through the 'arch' attribute to the 'resources' node. In this case, if the requirements are different for 32 and 64 bit installs, then yes we should make use of this attribute. Christophe
Attachment:
pgpi48k8DYz3f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
