On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 17:10 -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote: > I also want to do a better remote status implementation, so I can say > "show me all my systems that are installing in my lab/datacenter and > what's up with them". Right now we have that, but it's based on their > start time and whether they've finished. Spacewalk has another > implementation that provides more granularity, I used to have a > mod_python filter handler one (before various API things broke it, > and > it was unreliable anyway), but maybe I'll rewrite it someday. I'm anxious for your input here. I'm not yet sure of the best method to plug anamon (anaconda monitor) into this. > Anyhow, I think tracebacks would be nice, but then again a failure in > post doesn't trigger a traceback, so it's not that common either. Among lots of other files in /tmp, the anaconda monitoring code will send back a /tmp/anacdump.txt if encountered by your installing system. Thanks, James -- ========================================== James Laska -- jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx Quality Engineering -- Red Hat, Inc. ==========================================
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Kickstart-list mailing list Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
