Re: Pre-patched kickstart tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Summerfield wrote:
Michael DeHaan wrote:



If this is RHEL5, why not just add a repository in your ks file that
has all the updates in it?  Far easier than trying to reconstruct the
install tree.



I don't know why folk are giving EL5/Fedora answers when it's clear OP isn't using one of those. See where he says "I've tried linking the 'RedHat/base'."

Because upgrading to something more current has a few advantages. Not just updates, but being able to install your own RPMs at kickstart time too.

it might, but it's clear that's not what the OP was doing, and there are perfectly valid reasons for not upgrading.

I think we all need to take care to read the question, ascertain the facts and then provide a considered reply.


I was talking to Darrick on IRC earlier and had a few more facts than you did :)

( Anyhow, one last quick plug ... if you like, join #kickstart on irc.freenode.net ... nice channel, but would be nice if it grew some )



_______________________________________________
Kickstart-list mailing list
Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list

[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux