JB Segal wrote:
A somewhat more than cursory glance at the archives doesn't show the
answer to this...
At the end of a manually-configured install, where I spent a
reasonable amount of time
going through the available packages, picking those I wanted, and
those I didn't, the only
evidence of this left in the anaconda-ks.cfg is the
wholly-insubstantial lines
%packages
@editors
and that's IT.
A) Would anyone like to guess whether this is a bug, a design lacuna,
or a 'feature'?
B) Is there any way to generate an appropriate ks.cfg based upon this
system?
While it seems that the KS docs have been revised and updated for
RHEL5, at this hour on
a Sunday, I'm not managing to find anything about reverse-engineering
a package list, nor
anything about why I should ever NEED to do that.
Thanks for any help or suggestions you can give,
run "rpm -qa" on the installed system. That will generate a package list
for you.
Jason
