NFS versus HTTP kickstart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We currently use the NFS based kickstart for our installations but are trying to move to HTTP. However, in both our Fedora and RedHat 9 tests, while most things seem to be the same, some things don't seem to behave symmetrically.

For instance, and our biggest problem, is with Fedora Core 6 where with an NFS install it correctly probes and sets the graphics card in "/etc/xorg.conf" (to Intel "i810"), but with an HTTP install it probes it and sets the wrong one ("vesa").

We verified it's not an issue with the "%post" having a dependency on the NFS install directory, plus none of our home grown code/RPMs touches "xorg.conf". You'd think it would behave the same regardless.

Anyone with a possible explanation (or solution)?

Thanks in advance,

			- Matt

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Fahrner                                    2 South Park St.
Chief Systems Architect                         Willis House
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse               Lebanon, N.H.  03766
Tel: (603) 448-4100 x5150                       USA
Fax: (603) 443-6190                             Matt.Fahrner@xxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------


[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux