Howdy, has anyone noticed any features with RHEL5 + anaconda and packages selected vs packages actually installed. I installed a system via CD with manual package selection, and attempted to reuse the %package section from the resulting anaconda-ks.cfg file on a system that uses kickstart/nfs/pxeboot and I get drastically different sets of RPMS installed. I know that since RHEL5 is yum based, perhaps there more going on behind the scenes...is there an option that Kickstart requires that I could be missing? Package line from original anaconda-ks.cfg and kickstart file for 2nd system %packages @admin-tools @base @core @development-libs @development-tools @editors @gnome-software-development @system-tools @text-internet @x-software-development kernel-devel Here's a diff of sorted rpm -qa > /tmp/foo output from both systems (first 25 lines) bash-3.00$ diff -u cd_install.rpms pxe_ks_install.rpms|head -n 25 --- cd_install.rpms 2007-03-30 13:05:28.000000000 -0600 +++ pxe_ks_install.rpms 2007-03-30 13:05:59.000000000 -0600 @@ -1,24 +1,14 @@ -a2ps-4.13b-57.1.el5 acl-2.2.39-1.1 acpid-1.0.4-5 -adjtimex-1.20-2.1 -agg-2.4-2.1 -aide-0.12-7 -alacarte-0.10.0-1.fc6 alsa-lib-1.0.12-3.el5 alsa-lib-devel-1.0.12-3.el5 alsa-utils-1.0.12-3.fc6 -amanda-2.5.0p2-4 -amanda-client-2.5.0p2-4 amtu-1.0.4-4 am-utils-6.1.5-4.1.el5 anacron-2.3-45.el5 -antlr-2.7.6-4jpp.2 apmd-3.2.2-5 apr-1.2.7-11 apr-util-1.2.7-6 -arptables_jf-0.0.8-8 -arpwatch-2.1a13-15.8.1 aspell-0.60.3-7.1 Thanks in advance amm
