Re: e1000 still

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree.  The less hacking the better.  Red Hat could easily put a sleep 
variable in the init.c that is set at the syslinux command line.  Have you 
type something like:

linux network_wait=30

That parameter would then be passed to init which would then wait the 
specified amount of time.  Changing your network configuration to 
accommodate a operating system install is ridiculous.

Jeremy/Paul, opinions?


James


James S. Martin, RHCE
Contractor
Administrative Office of the United States Courts
Washington, DC
(202) 502-2394

kickstart-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on 03/21/2005 07:42:13 PM:

> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 15:29, James_Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This is an age old problem going back to my RH 7.2 days. 
> 
> Yes, this is old news, hashed over on several lists, in many threads. 
> James solution may help the original post-er to this thread, who was
> doing remote installs, with no access to the switches. 
> 
> The point, or mine anyway, is that hacking the code or having to modify
> switch configurations to be able to install the OS, are poor
> alternatives to be faced with.  How is this not a problem with anaconda,
> and why hasn't RedHat owned it / fixed it? 
> 
> -Ed 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kickstart-list mailing list
> Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list


[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux