RE: harddrive repository rather than isos

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> From: Philip Rowlands [mailto:phr@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> 
> Please don't post HTML to mailing lists.
> 
What html? I didn't put any html in my post intentionally. When I looked
back at the sent message, I didn't see any in there.

> On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Robinson, Andrew W. wrote:
> 
> >I had a repository of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 on an existing
> >partition on a server I'm attempting to build. When I pointed the
> >kickstart file to this repository, the installation failed with a
> >message saying it could not find the installation iso files. My
> >kickstart entry looked like this:
> >
> >install
> >
> >harddrive -partition=sda4 -dir=/RHEL
> 
> Shouldn't that be:
> install
> harddrive --partition=sda4 --dir=/RHEL

Outlook changed the double dashes to single ones. They are doubled in the
Kickstart file. 

The problem was not syntax. The problem was that Kickstart stopped at that
point and asked where the iso files were. I didn't want to use iso files. I
wanted to use a repository. (Because at that time, I had a repository, but
not iso files.)

> 
> See /usr/share/doc/anaconda-*/kickstart-docs.txt

This looks like the same documentation as the System Administration Guide.
It says: 

 --dir= Directory containing the RedHat directory of the installation tree.

This to me looks like it is referring to a repository rather than a
directory of iso files. 

Any suggestions?

Andrew


[Index of Archives]     [Red Hat General]     [CentOS Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux