Could it be this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112766 Joshua On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 11:43:17AM -0500, Jayaraman, Siva wrote: > > hello all, > > We are in the process of moving to more recent distributions of RH viz RHEL > AS-2.1 Update3 & RH AS-3.0. > > We have kickstart infrastructure in place deploying RH7.2 and RH AS-2.1 > distributions. > The kickstarts are done over NFS. > > The new distributions were added to the NFS server (which is the same as the > DHCP server). > But the new kickstarts (AS-2.1-U3 & AS-3.0) take an extremely long time now. > > The older kickstarts install around 800M of pkgs in about 3 minutes, whereas > now the newer kickstarts take around 50 minutes to install 650M of packages. > > I checked the network connection and it is always 100Mbps Full Duplex for > both cases. > The only difference I notice is that I get this message on one of the > virtual consoles - > "nfs: mount version older than kernel" > > The older kickstarts mount the nfs directory as nfs v2 whereas the newer > kickstarts mount the directory as v3. > Could this be the source of my problem? > > The NFS server is a RH7.2 box capable of doing both v2 & v3. > > If anyone has suggestions on how to debug/correct this problem, I would > highly appreciate it. > > thanks! > Siva Jayaraman > > > _______________________________________________ > Kickstart-list mailing list > Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list -- Joshua Jensen <jjensen@xxxxxxxxx> Work: 919 392 1488 Mobile: 919 454 9679 Fax: 919 392 7377 Pager: 866 264 2691 Epage: jjensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IBM Linux Architect - RHCE, RHCT, etc "If God didn't want us to eat animals, why did he make them out of meat?"
