Hi Richard Hmmm... to generate the list of packages, I did a rpm -qa on a sample machine and then stripped off the version information. So I had assumed that the dependancies were all taken care of. Is order important in the %packages section? If I said %packages --resolve-deps, would the installer automatically satisfy otherwise unspecified dependancies? On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 10:25:12AM -0500, Richard Black wrote: > > I can only think of anaconda death due to a package name not matching an > actual RPM. i.e. if you specify a package and it can't be found, then you > can expect anaconda to die. Here is my working %packages section I am > using for RHL80 which is a minimal install (could be smaller by subtracting > packages with a leading minus sign - you will see below that I don't want > iptables so that package is removed with the minus sign) and I add on a > few packages I need (# = comment, blank lines are ok): -- /\oo/\ / /()\ \ David Mackintosh |
