So, why then was Xconfigurator built into kickstart? It seems to make
a lot more sense to use XFree86's, though maybe a pain because
packages have to be pre-loaded. Is it because of the GUI install front
end?
I think it would be worth some effort to go back to "Xconfigurator
--kickstart" (not that I'm offering). As it is we have found no way to
make kickstart properly detect our Samsung 750p's.
- Matt
Erik Troan wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Matt Fahrner wrote:
It seems frankly a little silly to me to duplicate the code and
"reinvent the wheel". I wouldn't mind so much if it was at least
consistent.
We wouldn't mind either -- getting rid of the morass of Xconfigurator
would be great!
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
_______________________________________________
Kickstart-list mailing list
Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
