I hate to say it, but I wish it still did use "Xconfigurator". There
is considerable inconsistancy and duplication of code between
kickstart and Xconfigurator. For instance we have a monitor that will
be detected correctly under Xconfigurator but not under kickstart.
It seems frankly a little silly to me to duplicate the code and
"reinvent the wheel". I wouldn't mind so much if it was at least
consistent.
- Matt
Erik Troan wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
first time i've looked at Xconfigurator with the --kickstart option.
i'm assuming that the only place it makes sense to see this is in the
%post section of the ks.cfg file, right?
This is how old versions of Red Hat used to kickstart the X configuration. I
don't think anything uses it anymore.
Erik
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand |
| |
| Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
_______________________________________________
Kickstart-list mailing list
Kickstart-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/kickstart-list
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Matt Fahrner 2 South Park St.
Manager of Networking Willis House
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Lebanon, N.H. 03766
TEL: (603) 448-4100 xt 5150 USA
FAX: (603) 443-6190 Matt.Fahrner@xxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
