On 07/06/2009 04:50 PM, makkalot wrote:
Hi ML,
We were thinking with alikins about what new can be added to func.It probably
will be better to ask users who use framework. So:
-New module ideas
-New feature ideas
are really welcome so we can make func a better framework. Thanks in advance
for your comments !
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
What about strong integration with Cobbler Web to do things with systems
that are registered in Func, and to register new Cobbler systems that
are not? (i.e. this is what we're doing currently for the "deployment"
feature in Cobbler 2.0, using Func as transport for basic virt machine
operations). I could use some help on that for sure and would benefit
both apps greatly, I think. This is something that I probably won't get
around to doing well without some cross-functional efforts.
Sorry this is a bit of a idea hijack, but I think it would be great for
both apps.
If we need to rename the Cobbler Web package for 2.0 and consolidate
some of the ideas from FuncWeb into that project, we could actually do
that, as I'm making Cobbler Web a seperate package now. Renaming it is
fair game.
(If folks aren't interested, that's ok too)
I realize this is also leaning towards making another systems management
web app, and how that *might not* be the most interesting thing in the
world. However there is definitely power on building something like that
on a couple of very small codebases.
https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/cobbler-devel/2009-April/000246.html
(We also need things like this to do really fast batch actions against
groups of systems too, which Func is obviously very good at)
--Michael
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
