Marco Mornati wrote:
yes but I already have a github... is the one where you checkout the
first version of plugin! ;)
Anyway... here agein the url:
git clone git://projects.byte-code.com/func-bindings
Ah, ok.
Great, in which case we really don't need the patch to the list then.
Just a link to the repo and a summary would be ok.
As I've just said on IRC... the problem is that yaml library is not on
the maven repository (maven is used to leave jar out from your java
projects)... so i've to include that library in the project to make
maven able to find it.
Tomorrow I'll try to switch java api to json (and naturally i'll
insert the json in func-trasmit too) so I'll have no jar in the repos...
Sounds good.
Bye
Marco
Michael DeHaan wrote:
This will not be applied because of base64 encoded binary files in
the patch.
See my later note about why this is bad.
Since these patches are quite verbose, I would suggest you start a
branch on github that we can pull from, as this saves the lengthy
emails to the mailing list and also saves us from having to run "git
add" commands on new files.
See the other github repos here:
https://fedorahosted.org/func/wiki/GetTheSource
If anyone is sending in a medium sized patchset and doesn't want to
deal with Github, that is of course still perfectly ok, though for
repeat contributers that is very very helpful.
--Michael
_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
