On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:46 -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote: > Generally all methods in an API /are/ going to have different things > they return, because > this is how API's work. ok > > > I tried to modify my local installation but I found some troubles > > because some methods don't need a status, I guess we can create a fake > > of return status for these methods. what do you think? for example when a method don't require to have a status, return everytime 0 as status value. > Well, you are also doing some heinous evil things like parsing the > return from the command line (per your previous post). > Things would get much easier if you use XMLRPC directly and we work on > getting that XMLRPC API into the overlord > over local socket. I'd like to see that happen first from you guys > before we see whether "API standardization" is neccessary, because > I imagine parsing Func is extremely fragile and the cause of most of > your pain there. uhm, you are right... thanks for feedback luca -- Today is Setting Orange, the 14th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3174 Q: Are we not men? A: We are Vaxen. _______________________________________________ Func-list mailing list Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list
