Re: Some semi-architectural things to think about

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:39 -0500, Michael DeHaan wrote:
> Michael DeHaan wrote:
> > So, continuing from FudCON's hackfest ideas, I think these are the 
> > biggies in terms of "func core" kind of stuff to get done.   
> > Thoughts?  I've added the missing ones to the ideas page.  There are a 
> > lot of other expansion/module ideas, but this is probably the (larger) 
> > stuff that is perhaps missing.   However some of it is pretty much 
> > optional too.
> >
> > * minion-to-minion + ACLs (and of course docs on how to do this) .... 
> > a really neat feature
> >
> > * multiple-overlords/cert-sharing ... seemed to be requested a lot at 
> > talk
> >
> > * overlord-delegation (for network reasons, but also maybe 
> > efficiency.... there's a government app that basically did a tree like 
> > fan-out for this).
> >
> > * figuring out how to loosen up the permissions of caller (making sure 
> > things are accessible by TurboGears if it opens up a Client() 
> > object).  Currently it just needs the /etc/pki/func and /var/lib/func 
> > stuff.    This is probably not too much of a problem but worth talking 
> > about.
> >
> > * Groups?   We had talked about doing this in the WebUI and CLI 
> > seperately but we could perhaps actually make it part of the Func 
> > client API seperately and save a local DB so that could be shared?   
> > Thoughts?
> 
> By DB, I mean of course something like bsddb or even a config file, not 
> an actual DB :)
> 

for the love of all that is good and holy not bsddb.

-sv


_______________________________________________
Func-list mailing list
Func-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/func-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux Networking]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux