On Wed, 4 May 2016 08:46:46 +0200 Robert Mayr <robyduck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2016-05-04 5:10 GMT+02:00 Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > is the worst mailing list archive I can remember ever having had the > > displeasure to try to use. > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-linux/ in the archive software's > > default theme beats it to pieces, easy to find desired items the > > via date subject or poster, visited links differentiated, legibly > > big enough to read black text or blue links on white background. > > Who cares which poster or thread is most active? "More" links after > > showing only 5 posts requiring JS and loading, only to collapse to > > 5 on return after viewing only one? :-( :-( :-( :-( :-( -- > > It is not available anymore, at least not with the latest content. We > switched from pipermail to hyperkitty after some years of development. > For sure hyperkitty needs to be improved, and any kind of suggestions > are appreciated. If enhancements are doable our Infra team will work > on them. I'd suggest you to file a ticket in the Infra trac and > select "Mailing Lists" (hyperkitty) as component to address your > suggestions to the right persons. I would actually suggest you direct your ideas for improvement to the upstream hyperkitty community: https://gitlab.com/mailman/hyperkitty Some other suggestions: * You can actually download the posts in mailbox format, you might do that and read them via a local reader/whatever? That might be more flexable for your needs. * I don't see any issues here with setting the 'results per page' to say 200 and going to a article and back again. It stays at 200. If it resets to 5 for you, please do report this bug. kevin
Attachment:
pgpq5mTru4G8k.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
