Website changes look really great. I also appreciate the general design philosophy behind the site and wonder if the same could be pushed to the rest of Fedora websites (eg. getfedora) at some time in the future. It seems more polished generally speaking. Nadim ________________________________________ From: Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:57 PM To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fedora Marketing team; websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; For participants of the Documentation Project; developer-portal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:53:44PM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 04/20/2016 12:52 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > > This might also be interesting for Docs people. > > > How can we have these sorts of conversations without the multi-list problem? > > There are several discussions that ought to involve marketing, docs, > design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here. There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a discussion concerning all involved without cross posting. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
