Re: [Design-team] new Fedora Atomic sub-site - help wanted

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 03:31:15PM +0200, Robert Mayr wrote:
> For example EC2 images, they will be done by fedimg, could this be a
> transparent process for us? Actually it's not so easy to get the IDs and
> they need some work from our side (websites). Would be the best to make a
> script to gather them automatically through datanommer, as filed in our
> webticket [1.

Yes, I'd like Fedimg to automatically provide all of the needed
information with no need for human intervention. For this new case,
it's easier, because we're defining the release as gated by automated
testing, while Fedora Cloud Base image is still expected to be signed
off on by humans — that is, a certain RC will be declared gold. That
means there needs to be a mechanism for someone — release engineering,
presumably — to programatically signal that a given image build is
"gold" (whether for alpha, beta, or final, or for an updated image
rebuilt for a security reason).


-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
websites mailing list
websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux