My complaint rests on the fact that, to become an Ambassador in 2009, Fedora recommended writing a email to the community with personal information in it. Today, Fedora asks the potential applicant to present this info on a user page of which the info is not archived by third parties as readily. In 2009, I trusted Fedora. Fedora sled me to write an email to the marketing list that would instill 'trust' in me - yes, using that very language. That language was misleading and concealed the supposes open and transparent nature of the info I was divulging. Please help me contact Redhat legal affairs. They were helpful before, and would probably be glad to bring final resolution to the issue. Please consider that openness and transparency are only legitimate if entered into with full consent of the user. Without this prerequisite, what you claim as open is a socially irresponsible was to abdicate responsibility on your part. -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
