On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sijis Aviles <sijis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Elad <el.il@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Most build scripts (build.py) that I checked (I checked all except >> fedorahosted) contains useless conditions, options, functions and >> imports, which make it really hard for me to improve them. >> >> Only two build scripts were good, fp.o and fedoracommunity.org. >> I checked what happens if I copy the fp.o build.py to start.fpo, and >> it worked. So, my question is, wouldn't it be better if we do it for >> all sites? >> (also would you accept replacing start.fpo build.py with fp.o build.py?) >> >> -- >> -Elad. >> > > Ideally all the build.py scripts should be identical. I can't think of any > reason they would be different. > > There has also been a though to have a single build script that would build > all the sites. > > Sijis > Well my parallel build patches removes that junk. It was trac related and only relevant to fedorahosted. You might want to ignore this message as it turns out my patches works and it's not complicated as I thought it was. -- -Elad. -- websites mailing list websites@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
